<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hosting multiple domains on WordPress MU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchgap.com/blog/hosting-multiple-domains-on-wordpress-mu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchgap.com/blog/hosting-multiple-domains-on-wordpress-mu/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing For Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 01:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.searchgap.com/blog/hosting-multiple-domains-on-wordpress-mu/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgap.com/blog/?p=99#comment-285</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post Mike. Yes WordPress 3.0 is merging with WPMU - you can actually download the beta from - http://wordpress.org/download/release-archive/ - and it currently seems to have the same limitations as WPMU with respect to the ability to have www. prefixes. 

I have been doing installations of WPMU, WPML, and WPHive over the past few months and my conclusion is the following. 

WPMU or the multi-site ability of WordPress3.0 is best for managing multiple blogs on one site either as folders or sub-domains - or even new domains if you don&#039;t mind the www. prefix missing. 

WPML is best if you want to manage multiple languages with the same admin login. 

WPHive is best if you want to manage multiple wordpress sites each on their own domain, and still only have to maintain your updates to WordPress and to the plugins on one installation (i.e. one database). 

I am about to do a post comparing the benefits of all of the above 3 systems.. Watch this space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post Mike. Yes WordPress 3.0 is merging with WPMU &#8211; you can actually download the beta from &#8211; <a href="http://wordpress.org/download/release-archive/">http://wordpress.org/download/release-archive/</a> &#8211; and it currently seems to have the same limitations as WPMU with respect to the ability to have www. prefixes. </p>
<p>I have been doing installations of WPMU, WPML, and WPHive over the past few months and my conclusion is the following. </p>
<p>WPMU or the multi-site ability of WordPress3.0 is best for managing multiple blogs on one site either as folders or sub-domains &#8211; or even new domains if you don&#8217;t mind the www. prefix missing. </p>
<p>WPML is best if you want to manage multiple languages with the same admin login. </p>
<p>WPHive is best if you want to manage multiple wordpress sites each on their own domain, and still only have to maintain your updates to WordPress and to the plugins on one installation (i.e. one database). </p>
<p>I am about to do a post comparing the benefits of all of the above 3 systems.. Watch this space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.searchgap.com/blog/hosting-multiple-domains-on-wordpress-mu/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgap.com/blog/?p=99#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Google new version 3  will have same feature of wordpress Mu and I think MU is going to be completely out. what will you in new version for adding the www prefix to the domain mapping plugin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google new version 3  will have same feature of wordpress Mu and I think MU is going to be completely out. what will you in new version for adding the www prefix to the domain mapping plugin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

